01 janvier 2011
Une demande de moratoire de la pêche réalisée dans les grandes profondeurs à l’aide de chaluts entrant en contact avec le fond a été formulée à l’Assemblée Générale des Nations Unies par 1136 chercheurs de 69 pays dès 2004. Cette proclamation historique démontrait une inquiétude sans précédent de la recherche marine vis-à-vis de l’exploitation faite de milieux méconnus et extrêmement vulnérables. L’appel s’est ensuite amplifié jusqu’à atteindre 1452 signatures au total en 2006.
Document original sur : http://www.savethehighseas.org/publicdocs/DSCC_whitepaperexcerpts.pdf
Why the World Needs a Time-out on High-seas Bottom Trawling | L.E. Morgan, E.A. Norse, A.D. Rogers, R.L. Haedrich, S.M. Maxwell
Rather than fishing deep-sea fishes sustainably, commercial bottom trawlers reflect a typical pattern of serial overfishing that is best summarized as “plunder and push on.” Landings from high-seas bottom trawling make up 80 percent of high-seas bottom fishing, yet the habitats on which bottom trawling occurs—the rocky substrates of mid-oceanic ridges, seamounts, and submarine canyons—are rare, occupying less than 4 percent of the seafloor. Globally, the market impact of HSBT is tiny; it constituted only a fraction of one percent of the reported total marine fish catch in 2001 by volume and value.
Morgan and Chuenpagdee and Chuenpagdee and colleagues polled fishery professionals including fishermen, managers, conservationists, and scientists for their assessment of the ecological impact of 10 major fishing gears used in US waters, and found that experts from all sectors agree that bottom trawling is the most damaging fishing method of all.
As a result of their slow growth and low reproductive rates, deep-sea fishes are the most vulnerable of all fishes to overfishing. Because of the generally low food supply in the deep sea, fishes there are normally rather dispersed and come together in large groups only to spawn. From the perspective of HSBT, those aggregations provide the most profitable target. Exploiting their spawning aggregations is more like mining than fishing, because it so severely reduces the chance of recovery.
Many deep-sea fisheries are also multispecies fisheries or have a large bycatch of noncommercial fish species. As a result, they can be at least as devastating to non-target species as to their intended targets.
Because so many bottom-dwelling deep-sea organisms are extremely slow growing, even a single trawl causes damage that cannot be reversed for decades or centuries.6 This is particularly true on seamounts, which have an exceptionally high proportion of endemic species that are not found anywhere else.7 Endemism on seamounts may range as high as 30 to 50 percent.8 For endemic species, there are no sources for recolonization after a seamount is trawled, so endemism makes seamounts especially vulnerable.
Attempts to regulate the exploitation of seamount species such as orange roughy have failed to prevent fishery collapse, because these species are very different from shallow-water species in longevity, growth rate, and rate of reproduction. This means that methods of fish stock assessment and fisheries management models developed for shallow-water species are often inappropriate for deep-sea species. In addition, fundamental data about deep-sea fish populations are often lacking, or are gathered long after the fish stock had been decimated. Such information for depleted stocks may not apply to populations in their more natural state.
As deep-sea bottom-trawling fleets have expanded into the high seas, few regional fisheries management organizations (RFMOs) have the competence to regulate deep-sea fisheries, and fewer still have adopted effective regulatory measures. In areas where a need for regulation arises due to the commencement of a deep-sea fishery, the rapidity with which bottom-trawl fleets deplete these populations is such that they may no longer exist once the international institutions are operational.